First Term Paper - Why I know I am not in the Matrix

First - Why I know I am not in the intercellular substance - Term Paper ExampleAs a means of integrating with the plot and philosophical subthemes of The Matrix, this particular analysis will seek to engage the subscriber with a well balanced understanding for why it is obvious that the life that each and every private experiences is not a type of virtual or coded reality. In order to integrate with the question of what is real and what is a subjective viewpoint, it is necessary to discuss the way in which the theme of The Matrix gage adequately be defined with respect to the way in which Descartes discussed reality and what made humans certain of anything. Descartes viewed the subjectivity of the human experience, the question of reality, and the detail that no understanding or knowledge even any expectation could be made with regards to the existence of something beyond our own world. However, rather than letting this be a determination for the fact that all reality is subje ctive and could possibly be a clever illusion on the part of a twisted high power, Descartes determined that the best approach to this question of reality was the famous quote, I think therefore I am. ... In other words, if in fact some type of computer simulation of reality helped to define the world and laid a framework for the way in which humans thought and interacted with adept another, it is only logical to assume that this very same construct would not allow for independent thought with regards to considering the truth of reality. Thus, utilizing this train of logic, the individual can hard come to an understanding that if in fact a computer simulation, far and above beyond the capabilities of humans to infer, understand, or replicate, was indeed somehow invisibly in charge of the dynamics of our own reality, any such doubt and/or consideration for such a fact would be highly discourage and rule insane (Johnsen 227). However, as has been noted in the past several decades, consideration for such a topic has not been distanced to the outer realms of possibility and in fact has even been represented to the individual participant within society in the form of movies, artwork, graphic novels, and discussions within the philosophical community. Another reason why the individual should not integrate with the belief that the brain is in a vat or that all reality is merely a construct that is carefully intentional is the fact that such an approach is inherently non-falsifiable (Smoyak 9). Naturally, even a cursory level of understanding with regards to the scientific method or philosophical understanding should principal the individual to understand that a non-falsifiable theory is in and of itself unacceptable. The ultimate reason for this is that each and every theory must be able to stand upon its merit and not based upon a caveat of inherent truth. In such a way, the belief that all